Indian federalism is described as a “quasi-federal” system, combining features of both federation and union. While the Constitution aims to balance state autonomy with a strong Centre, multiple political, economic, and social issues continuously test this balance and shape Centre–State relations.
BulletsIn:
* India = “Union of States”; federation formed by devolution from a unitary, not by the states’ compact
* Core tension: state autonomy vs a strong Centre for unity & integrity
* Regionalism & demands for new states (Telangana, Gorkhaland, Vidarbha etc.) strain federal structure
* Centralised powers (Union, Concurrent, residuary powers, Articles 200, 249, 352, 356, 360, 256–257) tilt system to Centre
* Weak fiscal federalism; Centre controls major taxes, states depend on Finance Commission & transfers
* Unequal representation in Rajya Sabha; states have no real role in most constitutional amendments
* Indestructible Union, destructible units; Parliament can alter state boundaries without binding consent
* Governor’s office & Article 356 misuse often seen as tools of Central control over states
* Single Constitution, single citizenship, integrated judiciary & all-India services add unitary bias
* Centralised planning (NITI Aayog), economic disparities, language conflicts & external interference (NE region, neighbours) deepen federal tensions




What do you think?
It is nice to know your opinion. Leave a comment.