The Supreme Court of India ruled on 20 November 2025 in New Delhi that courts cannot impose fixed deadlines on Governors or the President for assenting to bills under Articles 200 and 201. The ruling followed an Article 143 reference and clarified constitutional discretion in the legislative process.

BulletsIn

•  Court bars fixed timelines for assent under Articles 200 and 201.
• Constitution gives no specific deadlines for Governors or President.
•  Bench says judicially adding timelines equals amending Constitution.
• Phrase “as soon as possible” signals urgency but not a set number of days.
•  Indefinite withholding of assent still unconstitutional and reviewable.
•  Judicial review allowed if Governor delays unreasonably.
•  Earlier April 2025 timeline ruling effectively set aside.
•  Decision protects federal balance and constitutional roles.
• Ensures legislatures get timely action but avoids rigid rules.
• Accountability retained through judicial oversight, not fixed limits.