Seven years into GST’s rollout, a surge in litigation highlights unresolved legal gaps and complex compliance burdens. Most disputes involve denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC), retrospective demands, and taxability interpretations. With GST Tribunals non-functional, cases are landing in High Courts and the Supreme Court.
BulletsIn
- Major rise in GST litigation due to unclear law, inconsistent interpretations
- Denial of ITC a top issue—often due to supplier registration or compliance lapses
- Calcutta HC ruled ITC can’t be denied to genuine buyers if suppliers default
- Retrospective supplier deregistration, GSTR-2A vs 3B mismatches driving cases
- Tribunal delay pushing minor disputes to High Courts, overburdening judiciary
- Tax on foreign employee salaries, mining royalties also under SC review
- Online gaming hit by retrospective 28% GST, thousands of crores in demand
- Supreme Court to hear gaming GST case again on 5 May 2025
- Safari Retreats case: ITC on construction unsettled by retro law amendment
- ADR mechanisms like arbitration, mediation seen as faster alternatives to court




What do you think?
It is nice to know your opinion. Leave a comment.